News
Bureau Projects
Publications Contact ©BOARD
25-08-09 // MONU #11 - CLEAN URBANISM
Do we simply
have to stop having sex to produce Clean Urbanism - i.e. an urbanism that is
dedicated to minimizing both the required inputs of energy, water, and food
for a city as well as its waste output of heat, air pollution as CO2, methan,
and water pollution, Samo Pedersen asks in his piece Sci-fi greenery..or
just Responsibility?. In fact Randall Teal sees the growing world population
frequently ignored in discussions on sustainability, as he points out in his
article Coming Clean: Owning Up to the Real Demands of a Sustainable Existence.
Fewer people spend less energy, and as the gas and oil supply will come to an
end sooner or later, saving energy may be a cheaper and smarter solution for
cities than depending on renewable energies, as Gerd Hauser, one of the leading
researcers on the implementation of the EU Directive on Energy Performance of
Buildings, explains in an interview with us, entitled Domes over Manhatten.
Although sustainability has recently become a cache misère for our lack
of intent, a trendy make-up hiding our incompetence, with Clean Urbanism being
its apotheosis as Nathalie Frankowski and Cruz Garcia (WAI) maintain in their
contribution Rendering the Clean, energy self-sufficient cities
are technically possible as Gerd Hauser states and explains using a five-point
manifesto. Greg Keeffe and Simon Swietochowski support that view by introducing
their Bio-Port project, a vision of a Free Energy City
set in Liverpool, where the old dockyards have been transformed into bio-productive
algae farms. Furthermore, the Office of Metropolitan Architecture (OMA) illustrates
in its project Zeekracht The North Sea Masterplan how wind
farms could be clustered along an Energy Super-Ring in the North Sea, distributing
national surpluses and supplying regional energy needs efficiently and profitably.
On the other hand, Clean Urbanism cannot only be understood from a purely technocratic
perspective, but also needs a social one as Claudio Astudillo Barra articulates
in his article Regenerative Ecologies A Prototypical Approach to
the Territory, introducing Felix Guattaris ideas of ecosophy. On
such social aspects Rogier van den Berg focuses in his piece on The Cooperative
City, where a community is created that triggers individual initiative
and the cooperation of its users to generate collective values. The Cooperative
City requires a flexible plan with an open end that is only guided by one set
of rules, described by Bryan Norwood and the Jackson Community Center as Mania:
An Emergent Sustainability of Density and Intensity, created by the disorganized,
hyperactivity of an actualized system with no specified, singular goal, a bottom-up
phenomenon that emerges from the individual events of architecture within the
city, combined with the ideology of urbanism conceived as anti-capitalism and
anti-homogenization. It is mania, and mania is clean. (Editorial by Bernd Upmeyer)
More information can be found on www.monu-magazine.com
11-06-09 // FUTURE MAGAZINE #16/17

BOARD's price winning design for the Estonian Academy of Arts in Tallinn has
been published in the Madrid based Future
Magazine #16/ 17.
27-05-09 // BUILDING FOR BOUWKUNDE - OPEN TO IDEAS

BOARD'
proposal with the title 241 has been selected out of 466 entries in the Open
International Ideas Competition Building for Bouwkunde to be published in the
"Building for Bouwkunde - Open to Ideas" book and is being exhibited
at the NAi exhibition Building for Bouwkunde from March 15, 2009 - June 7, 2009.
The jury
reported: "This entry is an intelligent and simple project, featuring a
formula of two buildings in one. It is an example of a dynamic high-rise, in
which sufficient attention has been given to issues of sustainability. The design
proposal has potential for rich spatial development."
13-02-09
// FUTURE MAGAZINE #15

The Bureau
of Architecture, Research and Design (BOARD)
has been published among offices such as OMA and MVRDV in the Rotterdam issue
of the Madrid based Future
Magazine #15.
There is no love at first sight when it comes to urbanism. With cities you fall
in love at second sight. The city of Rotterdam is a great example for this.
Second sight is probably the only way to fall in love with it anyhow, as its
beauty is hidden, but its ugliness famous and a fixed fact in people's heads.
For a long time it has suffered under the beauty of its urban competitor - the
picturesque Amsterdam. If Amsterdam is the Beauty, Rotterdam is the Beast. But
there is one group of people, who has always seen the handsome prince in the
beast: architects. Since the early 1990's, Rotterdam has become the worldwide
hotbed for architects and urban planners. When you are a fashion designer, you
want to be in Antwerp or Paris, but if you are an architect, there is only one
place: Rotterdam. (Bernd Upmeyer's statement on Rotterdam published on page
13)
06-02-09
// MONU #10 - HOLY URBANISM
Can the
view on cities get any bigger than through religion? Probably not. But we believe
that a magazine on urbanism such as MONU, that appears only twice a year, can
never have a too open perspective. Although the picture in this issue is big,
and the contributions are diverse and have different focuses, one thing can
be found that runs through almost this entire issue on Holy Urbanism. It is
the convinction that Holy Urbanism in the contemporary city does not appear,
and is not created any longer, merely by religion itself, but rather by a crossbreed
of religion and economy. How such Holy Urbanism can be produced is explained
by Daniel Hadley, for example, through the City Creek Center in Salt Lake City
that quite clearly defies the dichotomy between market and temple cities, in
his article A Mormon Megaproject. Thus, the City Creek Center is
designed to be a centre of consumerism and economic production, whose purpose,
nevertheless, is to ensure vitality in front of the nearby Temple Square. Sacred
and commercial spaces seem increasingly to coalesce and create a kind of Foucaultian
Heterotopia, an environment that is capable of juxtaposing in a single real
place several spaces and several sites that are in themselves incompatible,
as Colin Davies points out in his contribution The Sacred and the Holy:
Transient Urban Spaces. Peter Dorsey in his piece Strata and Sound:
The Adhan as an Urban Operating Procedure argues that contemporary Holy
Urbanism is flourishing especially at places where religion is creating a hybrid
together with capitalism. As an example he mentions the Lakewood Church Central
Campus in Houston, Texas that can seat more than 16.000 worshipers, adapting
efficiently into a spectacle-based environment by satisfying multiple consumer
appetites simultaneously. In the Nigerian city of Lagos the hybridisation processes
of religion and the market have even transformed the urban space itself into
a battlefield, in a free market where religion is a commodity to sell and an
urban survival strategy, as Emeka Udemba concludes in his God is a Nigerian.
Within such a capitalistic realm, religious buildings follow an increasingly
territorial logic that is similar to capitalistic corporations or franchises
such as McDonalds or Starbucks. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day
Saints, for example, standardized the design of their temples and thus created
a generic network of identical buildings that are spread out - Starbucks-like
- all over the planet, as Jesse LeCavalier illustrates in his article The
Mormon Churchs Infrastructure of Salvation. Carolyn Sponza, in her
contribution Drive-Through-Religion, even states that in the United
States, planning a church and a shopping mall always begins with the same capitalistic
question how much parking the site can accommodate. Such an attitude
leads in a lot of cases to the design of big box, Ikea-like, building types
that are perfectly located along a suburban highway. But religious big boxes
nevertheless - though convenient and visible - force visitors to seek them out,
park their cars, and walk toward their front doors. And if you dont think
its for you, you can keep driving along the highway until the next big
box containing another religion grabs your attention. Such Holy Urbanism promotes
religious choice and makes multi-religious spaces possible that are flexible
as pieces of fashion, as empty spaces for inter-religious dialogue that incarnate
the belief in a multi-faith society and allow for openness, and heterogeneity
as Karen Crequer reveals in her piece Sacred Beauties. (Editorial
by Bernd Upmeyer)
More information can be found on www.monu-magazine.com
19-10-06
// WORK, NOT LOVE Contribution for 'The Metropolis Issue' of Amsterdam's
streetfashion magazine CODE
#4. Buy "Work,
not Love" T-shirt at Tokyo's BeamsT Shop.
What
draws people into cities? Is it love or is it work? Some say that there is more
hunger for love and appreciation in this world than there is for bread. But
cities are growing and shrinking simply depending on whether there is work,
or not. A city is never beautiful by default, but perceived as beautiful to
the extent to which you like the job you have in the city. Once you have found
work, all other romantic ideas about cities fall in a simple order: work, love,
house... Everybody has experienced at least once in his or her lifetime, that
when you move to a city only for love, your stay is most likely limited. But
once you have found your professional path, anything is possible. There is no
love at first sight when it comes to urbanism. With cities you fall in love
at second sight.